CasePayNow resource

Attorney verification guide

Understand why the attorney may be contacted during a pre-settlement funding review.

Verification

Why the attorney is contacted

The attorney is contacted because funding providers need reliable case information before approving funds. The attorney may confirm that the applicant is represented, that a claim is active, and that the case facts support the requested review. This protects the applicant, the attorney, and the funding provider from relying on incomplete information.

Process flow

Simple attorney verification flowchart

The exact process can vary by provider, but most reviews follow a similar path.

1Applicant submits request
2Initial intake review
3Attorney is contacted
4Case details are verified
5Terms are reviewed
6Funding may be issued

Information commonly requested

Providers may ask for the attorney name and firm, case type, incident date, liability facts, insurance details, treatment status, lien information, prior funding, settlement status, and whether the case has enough expected recovery to support the request.

Why acknowledgment may be needed

The attorney may need to acknowledge the funding agreement, confirm representation, and recognize that repayment is generally handled from case proceeds if the case succeeds, subject to the written agreement.

What causes delays

Common delays include missing attorney contact information, slow response from the law firm, disputed liability, unclear insurance, incomplete treatment records, high liens, prior funding, very early case status, or a requested amount that is too high for the file.

Whether the attorney can decline participation

Yes. An attorney may decline to participate, may need more time to review the request, or may advise the client not to accept funding. If attorney participation is required and the attorney declines, funding may not move forward.

After verification

What happens after verification

After the attorney responds, the provider may continue underwriting, request more documents, reduce the requested amount, decline the file, or issue written terms for the applicant to review. The applicant should read the agreement carefully, compare payoff examples, and ask the attorney questions before accepting funds.

Questions

Common applicant questions

Will my attorney be told I applied?

Most reviews require attorney contact or verification before approval. The provider usually needs the attorney to confirm case details before terms can be finalized.

Does attorney verification mean approval?

No. Verification helps underwriting, but it does not guarantee approval, funding amount, timing, or final terms.

Can my attorney stop the funding?

The attorney can decline to participate or may advise against funding. If attorney verification is required and the attorney will not participate, the request may be declined.

What if my attorney is slow to respond?

The review may be delayed. Applicants can ask the law firm who handles funding verification and whether any authorization or document is needed.

What happens after verification?

If the file qualifies, the applicant receives written terms to review before deciding whether to accept. There is no obligation to accept terms just because a review was started.

Important limits

Funding claims depend on the final review

Approval is not guaranteed. Funding amounts, timing, fees, state availability, attorney participation, repayment language, and whether funding is non-recourse depend on the case facts, provider review, signed agreement terms, and final approval. Traditional credit and employment are generally not the main review factors, but provider requirements can vary.